eLearning Multimedia Project
General Scoring Guide
|
Criteria* |
Distinguished 4 |
Proficient 3 |
Apprentice 2 |
Novice 1 |
|
Content |
·
Fully developed, accurate, well-documented. Shows in-depth research. |
·
Adequate documentation, sufficient details & development |
·
Some documentation, details are few and/or generalized. |
·
Incomplete; insufficient research; inaccurate details. |
|
Presentation |
·
Effective delivery, smooth pace (Sound quality and
appropriateness; creativity/originality; video/picture quality and timing,
including establishing, detail, detail and closing shots; lighting;
appropriate use of graphics, animation; multimedia elements visible, adequate
font choices, color schemes, sizes, styles; quality/creativity of
credits. Multimedia effects enhance
learning and are seamless. |
·
Satisfactory delivery (see previously listed descriptors).
Multimedia effects enhance learning |
·
Effectiveness of delivery is limited (see previously listed
descriptors). Mulitmedia effects hinder learning (excessive use of
transitions, sound effects, for instance). |
·
Delivery is unacceptable (see previously listed
descriptors). Multimedia effects
distract form learning. |
|
Written
Summary |
·
Key elements: states
main idea; includes essential information; supporting ideas are clearly
stated; mechanical correctness (grammar, spelling, punctuation) |
·
Missing one key element of excellent summary writing |
·
Missing two key elements of excellent summary. |
·
Missing three or four key elements of excellent summary
writing. |
|
Understanding
of Task/Topic |
·
Student rephrases project description in own words and can
describe objectives of project relative to outcomes. |
·
Student rephrases project description in own words |
·
Student repeats task as defined by project description. |
·
Student cannot discuss project task. |
eLearning Multimedia Project
General Scoring Guide
|
Criteria* |
Distinguished 4 |
Proficient 3 |
Apprentice 2 |
Novice 1 |
|
Demonstration
of Knowledge |
·
Answers questions about content of project; can relate
information to similar issues and apply basic concepts to more complex issues. |
·
Answers questions about content of project; can relate
information to similar issues |
·
Answers questions about basic content of project. |
·
Cannot answer questions about content of project. |
|
Team
Work |
·
The work load was divided and shared equally by all team
members |
·
Most team members contributed their fair share of the work |
·
Most team members participated in some aspect of the work,
but workloads varied. |
·
One or two people did all or most of the work. |
|
Preliminary
Work |
·
Students completed fully developed storyboards prior to
computer creation, asked for permission for use of copyrighted material,
focused topic into specific workable subtopics. |
·
Students completed satisfactorily developed storyboards
prior to computer creation, asked for permission for use of copyrighted
material, focused topic into workable subtopics |
·
Students completed minimally developed storyboards prior to
computer creation, lack of attention to detail in dealing with copyright
issues, noticeable lack of topic focus. |
·
Incomplete storyboards, copyright issues not dealt with,
little or no topic focus. |
*
indicates additional weight may be given to any criterion in scoring process.
The above scoring guide is included as
a general tool to assist teachers in evaluating the quality of student
work. Depending on the nature of the
multimedia project and content area, revisions to the scoring guide may be
necessay. You may want to refer to the
following web site: http://www.elko,k12.nv.us./nntc/rubrics.htm